Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mankowski, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wyer, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mankowski, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wyer, R. S., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 9, 894-905 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167296229004
© 1996 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Cognitive Processes in Perceptions of Social Support

Eric S. Mankowski

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign emankows{at}s.psych.uiuc.edu

Robert S. Wyer, Jr.

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign rwyer{at}s.psych.uiuc.edu

University students with different perceptions of the social support available to them read about social interactions in which they imagined themselves as either the potential recipient of support, the provider of support, or an uninvolved third party. When they took the perspective of either the provider or a third party, their judgments of the provider's supportiveness increased with the support they perceived to be available to them personally. This difference was absent, however, when they imagined themselves as the recipient. Participants with a recipient's perspective had relatively better recall of behaviors that were inconsistent with their perception of the support available to them outside the laboratory, whereas those who took other perspectives did not. The cognitive processes that mediate these and other effects are discussed, and their implications for the stability of perceived support availability are evaluated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
D. J. Goldsmith, V. M. McDermott, and S. C. Alexander
Helpful, Supportive and Sensitive: Measuring the Evaluation of Enacted Social Support in Personal Relationships
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2000; 17(3): 369 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]