Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yzerbyt, V. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schadron, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yzerbyt, V. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schadron, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 12, 1312-1322 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672972312008
© 1997 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Social Judgeability and the Dilution of Stereotypes: The Impact of the Nature and Sequence of Information

Vincent Y. Yzerbyt

Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, yzerbyt{at}upso.ucl.ac.be

Jacques-Philippe Leyens

Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Georges Schadron

Catholic University of Lille, France

Social judgeability theory holds that people rely on naive theories when forming impressions. One rule is that perceivers should not judge others on the sole basis of their stereotypes. They may, however, misattribute a category-based impression to the target information and fall prey to the illusion of being informed provided individuating evidence is present and the stereotype is not made salient. The authors suggest that such a misattribution process contributes to the dilution of stereotypes. Subjects rated a member of a stereotyped group either after or both before and after reception of target information. The authors predicted that pseudorelevant information (i.e., information nondiagnostic for the specific judgment but diagnostic for many others) but not irrelevant information would lead to a stereotypical single judgment and dilute an initial stereotyped evaluation. Results confirmed the hypotheses and stress the role of implicit rules in social inference.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. A. Goodwin, A. Gubin, S. T. Fiske, and V. Y. Yzerbyt
Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping Subordinates by Default and by Design
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2000; 3(3): 227 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J.-P. Leyens, P. M. Paladino, R. Rodriguez-Torres, J. Vaes, S. Demoulin, A. Rodriguez-Perez, and R. Gaunt
The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2000; 4(2): 186 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]