Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savitsky, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gilovich, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Savitsky, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gilovich, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 3, 248-257 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167297233004
© 1997 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Remembering and Regretting: The Zeigarnik Effect and the Cognitive Availability of Regrettable Actions and Inactions

Kenneth Savitsky

Cornell University

Victoria Husted Medvec

Northwestern University

Thomas Gilovich

Cornell University

Regrets appear to follow a systematic temporal pattern: Regrettable commissions loom larger in the short term, whereas regrettable omissions are more prominent in the long run. This research examines whether this pattern can be attributed in part to the Zeigarnik effect, or peoples' tendency to remember incompleted tasks better than completed tasks. Does Zeigarnik-like rumination over regrettable failures to act make them easier to recall, and thus more available as sources of regret? A survey found that people think about their biggest regrets of inaction more frequently than their biggest regrets of action. In two additional studies, participants listed their three biggest regrets of action and three biggest regrets of inaction, and then attempted to recall them several weeks later. As anticipated, participants remembered more of their regrettable omissions than their regrettable commissions, an effect that was maintained when the severity of the regrets was controlled statistically.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
K. Epstude and N. J. Roese
The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2008; 12(2): 168 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
K. D. Markman and M. N. McMullen
A Reflection and Evaluation Model of Comparative Thinking
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2003; 7(3): 244 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Zeelenberg, J. van der Pligt, and A. S. R. Manstead
Undoing Regret on Dutch Television: Apologizing for Interpersonal Regrets Involving Actions or Inactions
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1998; 24(10): 1113 - 1119.
[Abstract]