|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness: A Procedure and Some Preliminary Findings
Arthur Aron
State University of New York at Stony Brook, aron{at}psychl.psy.sunysb.edu
Edward Melinat
California Graduate School of Family Psychology
Elaine N. Aron
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Robert Darrin Vallone
University of California, Santa Cruz
Renee J. Bator
Arizona State University
A practical methodology is presented for creating closeness in an experimental context. Whether or not an individual is in a relationship, particular pairings of individuals in the relationship, and circumstances of relationship development become manipulated variables. Over a 45-min period subject pairs carry out self-disclosure and relationship-building tasks that gradually escalate in intensity. Study 1 found greater postinteraction closeness with these tasks versus comparable small-talk tasks. Studies 2 and 3 found no significant closeness effects, inspite of adequate power, for (a) whether pairs were matched for nondisagreement on important attitudes, (b) whether pairs were led to expect mutual liking, or (c) whether getting close was made an explicit goal. These studies also illustrated applications for addressing theoretical issues, yielding provocative tentative findings relating to attachment style and introversion/extraversion.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 4,
363-377 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167297234003

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Smith, T. J. Loving, E. E. Crockett, and L. Campbell
What's Closeness Got to Do with It? Men's and Women's Cortisol Responses When Providing and Receiving Support
Psychosom Med,
October 1, 2009;
71(8):
843 - 851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Graham, J. Y. Huang, M. S. Clark, and V. S. Helgeson
The Positives of Negative Emotions: Willingness to Express Negative Emotions Promotes Relationships
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
March 1, 2008;
34(3):
394 - 406.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Ruscher and E. D. Hammer
The Development of Shared Stereotypic Impressions in Conversation: An Emerging Model, Methods, and Extensions to Cross-Group Settings
Journal of Language and Social Psychology,
September 1, 2006;
25(3):
221 - 243.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Tam, M. Hewstone, J. Harwood, A. Voci, and J. Kenworthy
Intergroup Contact and Grandparent-Grandchild Communication: The Effects of Self-Disclosure on Implicit and Explicit Biases Against Older People
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
July 1, 2006;
9(3):
413 - 429.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Vorauer
Miscommunications Surrounding Efforts to Reach Out Across Group Boundaries
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2005;
31(12):
1653 - 1664.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Klohnen, J. A. Weller, S. Luo, and M. Choe
Organization and Predictive Power of General and Relationship-Specific Attachment Models: One for All, and All for One?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2005;
31(12):
1665 - 1682.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Ruscher, E. L. Cralley, and K. J. O'Farrell
How Newly Acquainted Dyads Develop Shared Stereotypic Impressions through Conversation
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
July 1, 2005;
8(3):
259 - 270.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Harber and K. E. Wenberg
Emotional Disclosure and Closeness Toward Offenders
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
June 1, 2005;
31(6):
734 - 746.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. T. Reis
Action Matters, but Relationship Science is Basic
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
October 1, 2002;
19(5):
601 - 611.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|