This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yzerbyt, V. Y. Articles by Fiske, S. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Yzerbyt, V. Y. Articles by Fiske, S. T. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Group Entitativity and Social Attribution: On Translating Situational Constraints into Stereotypes

Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, yzerbyt{at}upso.ucl.ac.be

Anouk Rogier

Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Susan T. Fiske

University of Massachusetts-Amherst

The research investigates the impact of group entitativity on social attribution. Perceivers confronted with a group high in entitativity more readily call on underlying essence to explain people's behavior. We adapted Ross, Amabile, and Steinmetz's over attribution paradigm to a group setting. Participants were randomly selected to join a group of questioners, answerers, or observers in a quiz game. Unknown to the contestants, their group was presented to the observers as an entity or as an aggregate. As predicted, group entitativity promoted the use of dispositional attributions for the behavior of group members. These findings suggest that the explanation of group members' behavior is more likely to remain situation insensitive whenever perceivers share the naive theory that underlying features characterize the group. The discussion focuses on the impact of social attribution in the emergence of stereotypes and examines the role of subjective essentialism in social categorization and rationalization.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Magee and L. Z. Tiedens Emotional Ties That Bind: The Roles of Valence and Consistency of Group Emotion in Inferences of Cohesiveness and Common Fate. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2006; 32(12): 1703 - 1715. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Levy, C.-y. Chiu, and Y.-y. Hong Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2006; 9(1): 5 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Haslam, B. Bastian, P. Bain, and Y. Kashima Psychological Essentialism, Implicit Theories, and Intergroup Relations Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2006; 9(1): 63 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Rydell and A. R. McConnell Perceptions of Entitativity and Attitude Change Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2005; 31(1): 99 - 110. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. J. Seta, C. E. Seta, and T. Mcelroy Attributional Biases in the Service of Stereotype Maintenance: A Schema-Maintenance Through Compensation Analysis Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2003; 29(2): 151 - 163. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. L. Pickett The Effects of Entitativity Beliefs on Implicit Comparisons between Group Members Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2001; 27(5): 515 - 525. [Abstract] [PDF]