This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Regan, P. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Regan, P. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

What if You Can't Get What You Want? Willingness to Compromise Ideal Mate Selection Standards as a Function of Sex, Mate Value, and Relationship Context

California State University, Los Angeles, pregan{at}calstatela.edu

The majority of mate selection research focuses on what people want, rather than what they will settle for, in a partner. The present study explored the extent to which sex, self perceived mate value, and relationship context moderate ideal partner preferences and the willingness to compromise ideal standards. When considering a casual sex partner, men and women emphasized and were unwilling to compromise on physical attractiveness; when considering a romantic partner, both emphasized and refused to compromise on interpersonal responsiveness. Sex differences primarily occurred in the context of short-term mating, with women ideally seeking an older more interpersonally responsive sex partner and demonstrating less willingness than men to compromise their standards on a number of dimensions. Men's mate value largely was disassociated with their selection criteria; women's mate value correlated positively with their ideal preferences across many characteristics and in both mating contexts.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 12, 1294-1303 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672982412004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Hall Marital Meaning: Exploring Young Adults' Belief Systems About Marriage Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2006; 27(10): 1437 - 1458. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Tolmacz Attachment Style and Willingness to Compromise When Choosing a Mate Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 2004; 21(2): 267 - 272. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Mikulincer, V. Florian, and G. Hirschberger The Existential Function of Close Relationships: Introducing Death Into the Science of Love Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2003; 7(1): 20 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. P. Schmitt, A. Couden, and M. Baker The Effects of Sex and Temporal Context on Feelings of Romantic Desire: An Experimental Evaluation of Sexual Strategies Theory Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2001; 27(7): 833 - 847. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Campbell, J. A. Simpson, D. A. Kashy, and G. J. O. Fletcher Ideal Standards, the Self, and Flexibility of Ideals in Close Relationships Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2001; 27(4): 447 - 462. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Gutierres, D. T. Kenrick, and J. J. Partch Beauty, Dominance, and the Mating Game: Contrast Effects in Self-Assessment Reflect Gender Differences in Mate Selection Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1999; 25(9): 1126 - 1134. [Abstract] [PDF]