Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abele, A.
Right arrow Articles by Petzold, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Abele, A.
Right arrow Articles by Petzold, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 12, 1343-1357 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672982412008
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Positive Mood and In-Group-Out-Group Differentiation in a Minimal Group Setting

Andrea Abele

University of Erlangen, Germany, abele{at}phil.uni-erlangen.de

Guido H. E. Gendofla

University of Erlangen, Germany

Peter Petzold

University of Erlangen, Germany

Two experiments examined the impact of positive mood on impression formation about in-group and out-group members. Participants performed a dot estimation task and received feedback that they belonged either to the group of overestimators or underestimators. They rated the likability of target persons characterized by positive or negative traits and, in half of the trials, by their group membership (overestimators or underestimators). These judgments were made either in an unmanipulated neutral mood state or after induction of a positive mood. Both experiments revealed a stronger in-group-out-group differentiation in a positive mood than in a neutral mood. Without group label presented, the impact of the individuating information was the same in both mood states; with group label presented, it was smaller in positive mood. Response latencies did not vary with mood. The data demonstrate a twofold impact of mood, due to both its informational function and its enhancement of the categorizing information's weight.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. J. Stroessner, D. M. Mackie, and V. Michalsen
Positive Mood and the Perception of Variability Within and Between Groups
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2005; 8(1): 5 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
F. Ric
Effects of the Activation of Affective Information on Stereotyping: When Sadness Increases Stereotype Use
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2004; 30(10): 1310 - 1321.
[Abstract] [PDF]