Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, T.
Right arrow Articles by Huo, Y. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, T.
Right arrow Articles by Huo, Y. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 2, 137-146 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298242003
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Conflict with Outsiders: Disputing within and Across Cultural Boundaries

Tom Tyler

University of California, Berkeley, tomtyler{at}socrates.berkeley.edu

E. Allan Lind

Duke University

Ken-Ichi Ohbuchi

Tohoku University

Ikuo Sugawara

Fukushima University

Yuen J. Huo

University of California, Los Angeles

Two studies examine how people's reactions to conflict resolution efforts by third parties are affected by whether the conflict occurs within or across cultural boundaries. Both test the social categorization hypothesis of the relational model of authority: that third party decisions will be evaluated more strongly through judgments about the treatment of disputants (relational concerns) in conflicts within groups and more strongly in terms of decisions favorability (instrumental concerns) in disputes across groups. The first study tests this hypothesis in a study of conflicts between American employees and their supervisors, whereas the second does so in a study of conflicts involving Japanese and Western teachers. The results of both studies support the predictions of the relational model. In both studies, relational concerns are more important in within-group disputes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
H. Yang, E. Van de Vliert, and K. Shi
Interpersonal Relationship and Lay Third Parties' Side-Taking Preference: A Cross-Cultural Study Among Chinese and Dutch
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2007; 38(4): 438 - 457.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
T. R. Tyler, Y. J. Huo, and E. A. Lind
The Two Psychologies of Conflict Resolution: Differing Antecedents of Pre-Experience Choices and Post-Experience Evaluations
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 1999; 2(2): 99 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
S. PETRONIO, N. ELLEMERS, H. GILES, and C. GALLOIS
(Mis)communicating Across Boundaries: Interpersonal and Intergroup Considerations
Communication Research, December 1, 1998; 25(6): 571 - 595.
[Abstract]