Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klohnen, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mendelsohn, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Klohnen, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mendelsohn, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 3, 268-278 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298243004
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Partner Selection for Personality Characteristics: A Couple-Centered Approach

Eva C. Klohnen

University of California at Berkeley, eklohnen{at}socrates.berkeley.edu

Gerald A. Mendelsohn

University of California at Berkeley

Both personality similarity and complementarity have been hypothesized to underlie mate selection. However, neither hypothesis has received strong and consistent empirical support. This study examined personality matching in couples by taking within-couple similarity as the basic unit of analysis. On the assumptions that individuals seek in another what they value in themselves but that they cannot always get what they want, it was hypothesized (a) that the similarity of partners' self-descriptions is positively related to self-liking, (b) that there is assortative mating for self-liking, (c) that there is significant similarity between subjects' ideal self-descriptions and their perceptions of their partners, and (d) that participants bias their perceptions of their partners in the direction of their ideal self-conceptions. The authors examined and found support for the four hypotheses by analyzing California Q-set ratings provided by both partners of couples, who described themselves, their ideal selves and their partners.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
W. B. Swann JR, K. L. McClarty, and P. J. Rentfrow
Shelter from the storm? Flawed reactions to stress in precarious couples
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2007; 24(5): 793 - 808.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
W. B. Swann Jr., J. G. Sellers, and K. L. McClarty
Tempting Today, Troubling Tomorrow: The Roots of the Precarious Couple Effect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 93 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
E. C. Klohnen, J. A. Weller, S. Luo, and M. Choe
Organization and Predictive Power of General and Relationship-Specific Attachment Models: One for All, and All for One?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2005; 31(12): 1665 - 1682.
[Abstract] [PDF]