Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brigham, N. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brigham, N. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 4, 353-361 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298244002
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Effects of Power Imbalance and the Presence of Third Parties on Reactions to Harm: Upward and Downward Revenge

Sung Hee Kim

University of Kentucky, shkimO0{at}pop.uky.edu

Richard H. Smith

University of Kentucky

Nancy L. Brigham

University of Kentucky

This study examined the effect of power imbalance and the presence of third parties on vengeful reactions to harm. At the onset of their interaction, participants were unjustly harmed by a confederate who had either more or less power than they had. As predicted, in the presence of a justice-concerned third party, upward revenge (people of low power taking revenge against those of high power) was greater than downward revenge (people of high power taking revenge against those of low power). However, in the absence of a third party, downward revenge was greater than upward revenge. These findings highlight the important role of third parties in determining vengeful behavior in situations of power imbalance and add additional evidence for the importance of justice concerns in revenge.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
B. A. Jacobs
A Typology of Street Criminal Retaliation
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, August 1, 2004; 41(3): 295 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
I. M. Jawahar
A Model of Organizational Justice and Workplace Aggression
Journal of Management, December 1, 2002; 28(6): 811 - 834.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. D. Batson, M. J. Bowers, E. A. Leonard, and E. C. Smith
Does Personal Morality Exacerbate or Restrain Retaliation after Being Harmed?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2000; 26(1): 35 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]