Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yik, M. S.M.
Right arrow Articles by Paulhus, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yik, M. S.M.
Right arrow Articles by Paulhus, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 4, 399-406 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298244006
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Do Chinese Self-Enhance or Self-Efface? It's a Matter of Domain

Michelle S.M. Yik

University of British Columbia, myik{at}unixg.ubc.ca

Michael H. Bond

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Delroy L. Paulhus

University of British Columbia

The assumption that Chinese tend to self-efface has mixed support in the scanty empirical literature. The conflicting findings may be attributable to measuring different domains in different studies. Therefore, we assessed self-enhancement across eight domains of person perception in a Hong Kong Chinese sample. Twenty-one groups of college students, after working together for 13 weeks on class projects, were asked to rate fellow group members on all eight domains. The degree of self-enhancement or self-effacement was determined by comparing self-ratings with mean peer ratings. Results showed an overall self-effacement effect, which was significant for five of eight personality dimensions. The exceptions were agentic traits such as Assertiveness, Openness to Experience, and Intellect. The overall rate of self-enhancers (43%) was substantially lower than the rate for a comparable North American sample (56%). Although those who self-enhanced most reported high self-esteem, they were not rated as better adjusted by their peers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
S.-T. Cheng, H. Fung, and A. Chan
Maintaining Self-Rated Health Through Social Comparison in Old Age
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., September 1, 2007; 62(5): P277 - P285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. G. Haselton and D. Nettle
The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2006; 10(1): 47 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. B. ELLIS and G. M. WITTENBAUM
Relationships Between Self-Construal and Verbal Promotion
Communication Research, December 1, 2000; 27(6): 704 - 722.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
Y. Endo, S. J. Heine, and D. R. Lehman
Culture and Positive Illusions in Close Relationships: How My Relationships Are Better than Yours
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2000; 26(12): 1571 - 1586.
[Abstract] [PDF]