Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zanna, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zanna, M. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 4, 427-441 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298244009
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Cross-Dimension Ambivalence toward Social Groups: Can Ambivalence Affect Intentions to Hire Feminists?

Tara K. MacDonald

University of Lethbridge

Mark P. Zanna

University of Waterloo

Cross-dimension ambivalence refers to the experience of evaluating an attitude object positively on one dimension (e.g., admiration) but negatively on another (e.g., affection). In two studies, the authors examined cross-dimension ambivalence toward feminists. In Study 1, they found that, as expected, males exhibiting ambivalence toward feminists tended to rate them positively on the dimension of admiration but negatively on the dimension of affection. In Study 2, the authors primed participants by having them attend to positive agentic qualities or negative interpersonal qualities in an audio recording of a job interview. They were then asked to rate three resume's, one of which described a feminist. Participants exhibiting cross-dimension ambivalence toward feminists who received the positive prime reported more liking for, and great intentions to hire, the feminist than did ambivalent people receiving the negative prime. Nonambivalent participants, however, were unaffected by the priming manipulation. Implications of this research are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
G. R. Maio and G. Thomas
The Epistemic-Teleologic Model of Deliberate Self-Persuasion
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2007; 11(1): 46 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
F. Van Overwalle and F. Siebler
A Connectionist Model of Attitude Formation and Change
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2005; 9(3): 231 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. K. Kachadourian, F. Fincham, and J. Davila
Attitudinal Ambivalence, Rumination, and Forgiveness of Partner Transgressions in Marriage
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2005; 31(3): 334 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. W. Bell and V. M. Esses
Ambivalence and Response Amplification: A Motivational Perspective
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2002; 28(8): 1143 - 1152.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. M. Jackson, V. M. Esses, and C. T. Burris
Contemporary Sexism and Discrimination: The Importance of Respect for Men and Women
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2001; 27(1): 48 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. T. Jost and D. Burgess
Attitudinal Ambivalence and the Conflict between Group and System Justification Motives in Low Status Groups
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2000; 26(3): 293 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]