|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 5,
482-495 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298245004
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
Leadership Style and the Discussion of Shared and Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups
James R. Larson, Jr.
The University of Illinois at Chicago, jlarson{at}uic.edu
Pennie G. Foster-Fishman
Michigan State University
Timothy M. Franz
The University of Illinois at Chicago
This study found that during group decision-making discussions, shared information (i.e., information held by all group members) was brought into discussion earlier, and was more likely to be mentioned overall, than was unshared information (i.e., unique information held by just one member or another). These results are consistent with a dynamic information sampling model of group discussion. It also was found that groups with a participative leader discussed more information (both shared and unshared) than groups with a directive leader, but that directive leaders were more likely to repeat information (especially unshared) than participative leaders. Finally, it was found that leadership style and the information held by the leader prior to discussion interacted to influence group decision quality. The relevance of these findings for existing contingency theories of leadership is discussed.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Larson Jr and V. M. Harmon
Recalling Shared vs. Unshared Information Mentioned During Group Discussion: Toward Understanding Differential Repetition Rates
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
July 1, 2007;
10(3):
311 - 322.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Van Swol and C. L. Ludutsky
Tell Me Something I Don't Know: Decision Makers' Preference for Advisors With Unshared Information
Communication Research,
June 1, 2007;
34(3):
297 - 312.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Van Swol
Perceived Importance of Information: The Effects of Mentioning Information, Shared Information Bias, Ownership Bias, Reiteration, and Confirmation Bias
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
April 1, 2007;
10(2):
239 - 256.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Henningsen, M. L. M. Henningsen, J. Eden, and M. G. Cruz
Examining the Symptoms of Groupthink and Retrospective Sensemaking
Small Group Research,
February 1, 2006;
37(1):
36 - 64.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Henningsen and M. L. M. Henningsen
Examining Social Influence in Information-Sharing Contexts
Small Group Research,
August 1, 2003;
34(4):
391 - 412.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. G. Sargis and J. R. Larson Jr.
Informational Centrality and Member Participation During Group Decision Making
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
October 1, 2002;
5(4):
333 - 347.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Franz and J. R. Larson Jr.
The Impact of Experts on Information Sharing During Group Discussion
Small Group Research,
August 1, 2002;
33(4):
383 - 411.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. SAVADORI, L. M. VAN SWOL, and J. A. SNIEZEK
Information Sampling and Confidence Within Groups and Judge Advisor Systems
Communication Research,
December 1, 2001;
28(6):
737 - 771.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. SUSSKIND
Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Related to Customer Complaints About Service Experiences
Communication Research,
June 1, 2000;
27(3):
353 - 378.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|