Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Enhancement Bias in Descriptions of Self and Others

Joachim Krueger

Brown University, joachim_krueger{at}brown.edu

Self-enhancement bias is the tendency to describe oneself more positively than a normative criterion would predict. This article reviews the common-rater and common-target paradigms for the assessment of enhancement bias and proposes a social-normative paradigm as an alternative. In this paradigm, enhancement bias is conceptualized as an egocentric pattern of discrepancies between self-ratings and relevant social norms. Correlations between a person's ratings of trait descriptiveness and ratings of trait desirability indicate the degree of enhancement (or diminishment) when the group averages of these ratings are controlled. Two studies demonstrate that most people self-enhance, expect others to self-enhance, and abstain from self-enhancement when instructed to estimate the social norms. Results suggest that enhancement is a controllable bias rather than a cognitive illusion.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 5, 505-516 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298245006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
G. S. Preuss and M. D. Alicke
Everybody Loves Me: Self-Evaluations and Metaperceptions of Dating Popularity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2009; 35(7): 937 - 950.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Zuckerman and R. E. O'Loughlin
Self-Enhancement by Social Comparison: A Prospective Analysis
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2006; 32(6): 751 - 760.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
C. Loh, C. A. Gidycz, T. R. Lobo, and R. Luthra
A Prospective Analysis of Sexual Assault Perpetration: Risk Factors Related to Perpetrator Characteristics
J Interpers Violence, October 1, 2005; 20(10): 1325 - 1348.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Krueger and D. Stanke
The Role of Self-Referent and Other-Referent Knowledge in Perceptions of Group Characteristics
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2001; 27(7): 878 - 888.
[Abstract] [PDF]