Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stapel, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Winkielman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stapel, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Winkielman, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 6, 634-646 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298246007
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of Context-Target Similarity, Distinctness, and Dimensional Relevance

Diederik A. Stapel

University of Amsterdam, sp_stapel{at}macmail.psy.uva.nl

Piotr Winkielman

University of Michigan

Two studies examine conditions under which context information that is cognitively accessible and relevant to interpretation of an ambiguous target stimulus is primarily used as an interpretation frame (and leads to assimilation) or as a comparison standard (and leads to contrast). The currently dominating perspectives explain context effects in terms of the perceived extremity and appropriateness of context information. In the present studies, it is demonstrated that, beyond extremity and appropriateness, whether context information instigates assimilative interpretation or contrastive comparison processes may depend on three additional factors: (a) categorical context-target similarity, (b) perceived distinctness of the context information, and (c) relevance of the context information to the dimension on which the target will be judged.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Biernat and T. K. Vescio
She Swings, She Hits, She's Great, She's Benched: Implications of Gender-Based Shifting Standards for Judgment and Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2002; 28(1): 66 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. L. Pickett
The Effects of Entitativity Beliefs on Implicit Comparisons between Group Members
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2001; 27(5): 515 - 525.
[Abstract] [PDF]