Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundgren, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Prislin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lundgren, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Prislin, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 7, 715-726 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298247004
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Motivated Cognitive Processing and Attitude Change

Sharon R. Lundgren

Texas A&M University

Radmila Prislin

San Diego State University, rprislin{at}sunstroke.sdsu.edu

Two experiments investigated cognitive processing and attitudes under different motivations. In Experiment 1, 63 participants had either strong nondirectional (accuracy) or directional (defensive, impression) motives. Accuracy motivation resulted in extensive objective processing. Defensive motivation resulted in extensive biased processing. Impression motivation resulted in extensive processing that was directional in some measures but balanced in other measures. Cognitive processing mediated the effects of motivation on attitudes, which were stable across measurements. In Experiment 2, 44 participants processed under two combined strong motivations. Accuracy was successfully combined with directional motivation in both processing and attitudes. It reduced bias when combined with impression motivation but not when combined with defensive motivation. Two opposing directional motivations were difficult to combine, and participants eventually abandoned extensive processing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Kerschreiter, S. Schulz-Hardt, A. Mojzisch, and D. Frey
Biased Information Search in Homogeneous Groups: Confidence as a Moderator for the Effect of Anticipated Task Requirements
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2008; 34(5): 679 - 691.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
A. Mojzisch, S. Schulz-Hardt, R. Kerschreiter, and D. Frey
Combined Effects of Knowledge About Others' Opinions and Anticipation of Group Discussion on Confirmatory Information Search
Small Group Research, April 1, 2008; 39(2): 203 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. M. Smith, L. R. Fabrigar, D. M. Powell, and M.-J. Estrada
The Role of Information-Processing Capacity and Goals in Attitude-Congruent Selective Exposure Effects
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2007; 33(7): 948 - 960.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
E. Jonas, S. Schulz-Hardt, and D. Frey
Giving Advice or Making Decisions in Someone Else's Place: The Influence of Impression, Defense, and Accuracy Motivation on the Search for New Information
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2005; 31(7): 977 - 990.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
E. Borgida and E. N. Stark
New Media and Politics: Some Insights From Social and Political Psychology
American Behavioral Scientist, December 1, 2004; 48(4): 467 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. H. Eagly, P. Kulesa, L. A. Brannon, K. Shaw, and S. Hutson-Comeaux
Why Counterattitudinal Messages Are as Memorable as Proattitudinal Messages: The Importance of Active Defense Against Attack
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2000; 26(11): 1392 - 1408.
[Abstract] [PDF]