Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, B.
Right arrow Articles by Forsterling, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, B.
Right arrow Articles by Forsterling, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 8, 838-854 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298248005
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

What Determines Behavioral Decisions? Comparing the Role of Covariation Information and Attributions

Beate Schuster

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat-Munich

Udo Rudolph

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat-Munich

Friedrich Forsterling

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat-Munich

This study investigated whether behavioral decisions (e.g., persistence, help seeking) are influenced by covariation information and if this influence is mediated by attributions. In Experiment 1, participants belonging to different age groups received covariation information, and causal attributions as well as behavioral-reaction decisions were assessed. Experiment 1 replicated the often-documented influence of covariation information on attributions. Furthermore, it revealed that covariation information affects behavioral decisions more strongly, and developmentally earlier, than do attributions. In Experiment 2, participants were provided with conflicting covariation information and attributions. Covariation information had a stronger impact on reaction decisions than attributions. Experiment 3 again provided participants with covariation information and assessed attributions and behavioral choices, as well as reaction times. Participants provided with covariation information needed less time to choose behavioral reactions than to choose attributions. We conclude that behavioral decisions can be directly determined by covariation information without attributional mediation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
U. Rudolph and U. von Hecker
Three Principles of Explanation: Verb Schemas, Balance, and Imbalance Repair
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2006; 25(4): 377 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]