This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Taylor, K. M. Articles by Shepperd, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Taylor, K. M. Articles by Shepperd, J. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Bracing for the Worst: Severity, Testing, and Feedback Timing as Moderators of the Optimistic Bias

University of Florida, ktaylor{at}nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu

James A. Shepperd

University of Florida, shepperd{at}psych.ufl.edu

People are remarkably optimistic in their personal predictions. Hozwver, people occasionally will be pessimistic, bracing themselves for negative feedback, if they anticipate that their optimistic out-look might be challenged. The authors examined the effects of event severity, testing, and feedback timing on personal predictions. Participants believed they would or would not be tested for a medical condition with or without severe consequences. At the beginning of the experiment, participants who anticipated being tested believed they would receive their test results in 3 to 4 weeks. At the end of the experiment, these participants learned that they would receive their test results in anew moments. As predicted, participants who were tested were most pessimistic when anticipating immediate feedback for a deficiency with severe consequences. Further analyses revealed that participants' personal predictions were related to their affect.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 9, 915-926 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298249001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. M. P. Klein and M. M. Monin When Focusing on Negative and Positive Attributes of the Self Elicits More Inductive Self-Judgment Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2009; 35(3): 376 - 384. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Sweeny, J. A. Shepperd, and P. J. Carroll Expectations for Others' Outcomes: Do People Display Compassionate Bracing? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2009; 35(2): 160 - 171. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Sweeny and J. A. Shepperd Do People Brace Sensibly? Risk Judgments and Event Likelihood Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2007; 33(8): 1064 - 1075. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. M. P. Klein and M. E. Stefanek Cancer Risk Elicitation and Communication: Lessons from the Psychology of Risk Perception CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2007; 57(3): 147 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Shepperd, J. Grace, L. J. Cole, and C. Klein Anxiety and Outcome Predictions Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2005; 31(2): 267 - 275. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. Brownstein, S. J. Read, and D. Simon Bias at the Racetrack: Effects of Individual Expertise and Task Importance on Predecision Reevaluation of Alternatives Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2004; 30(7): 891 - 904. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Shepperd, M. Helweg-Larsen, and L. Ortega Are Comparative Risk Judgments Consistent Across Time and Events? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2003; 29(9): 1169 - 1180. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Helweg-Larsen and J. A. Shepperd Do Moderators of the Optimistic Bias Affect Personal or Target Risk Estimates? A Review of the Literature Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2001; 5(1): 74 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF]