This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Arriaga, X. B. Articles by Rusbult, C. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Arriaga, X. B. Articles by Rusbult, C. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Standing in My Partner's Shoes: Partner Perspective Taking and Reactions to Accommodative Dilemmas

Claremont Graduate University, arriaga{at}cgu.edu

Caryl E. Rusbult

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Four studies examined the role of partner perspective taking in shaping reactions to accommodative dilemmas-situations in which a close partner enacts a potentially destructive behavior. Participants included marital partners (Study 1) and dating partners (Studies 2, 3, and 4). Studies 1, 3, and 4 examined preexisting tendencies toward partner perspective taking, and Studies 2, 3, and 4 included experimental manipulations of perspective. In all four studies, adopting the partner's perspective (rather than one's own) during an accommodative dilemma resulted in (a) more positive emotional reactions, more relationship-enhancing attributions, and enhanced inclinations toward constructive responding and (b) less negative emotional reactions, less partner-blaming attributions, and reduced inclinations toward destructive responding. In Studies 2, 3, and 4, analyses examining the simultaneous effects of partner perspective taking, commitment level, and general perspective taking revealed that adopting the partner's perspective exerts unique, independent effects on accommodation-relevant emotions, attributions, and behavioral preferences.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 9, 927-948 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298249002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. S. Mayer, C. M. Frantz, E. Bruehlman-Senecal, and K. Dolliver Why Is Nature Beneficial?: The Role of Connectedness to Nature Environment and Behavior, September 1, 2009; 41(5): 607 - 643. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Mikulincer, V. Florian, and G. Hirschberger The Existential Function of Close Relationships: Introducing Death Into the Science of Love Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2003; 7(1): 20 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. J. K. Klein and S. D. Hodges Gender Differences, Motivation, and Empathic Accuracy: When it Pays to Understand Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2001; 27(6): 720 - 730. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Takaku, B. Weiner, and K.-I. Ohbuchi A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Effects of Apology and Perspective Taking on Forgiveness Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2001; 20(1-2): 144 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]