Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirkpatrick, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kirkpatrick, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 9, 961-973 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298249004
© 1998 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

God as a Substitute Attachment Figure: A Longitudinal Study of Adult Attachment Style and Religious Change in College Students

Lee A. Kirkpatrick

College of William & Mary, lakirk{at}facstaff.wm.edu

In a two-wave survey study designed to extend and refine previous research on religion as an attachment process, college students completed a four-category attachment-style measure and several religiosity measures at Time 1; a subsample also completed identical religiosity measures about 4 months later (Time 2). Analysis of Time 1 data (N= 1,126) extended previous findings by demonstrating that positive mental models of both self and others were related cross-sectionally to positive images of God and perceived relationships with God. Longitudinal analyses (N = 297) revealed that positive religious change over time was predicted by negative models of self and positive models of others. Discussion focuses on the dynamics of religious belief and change as a function of psychological attachment processes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. E. Park, J. Crocker, and K. D. Mickelson
Attachment Styles and Contingencies of Self-Worth
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2004; 30(10): 1243 - 1254.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. Birgegard and P. Granqvist
The Correspondence between Attachment to Parents and God: Three Experiments Using Subliminal Separation Cues
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2004; 30(9): 1122 - 1135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. L. Brown, R. M. Nesse, J. S. House, and R. L. Utz
Religion and Emotional Compensation: Results from a Prospective Study of Widowhood
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2004; 30(9): 1165 - 1174.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
P. Granqvist and B. Hagekull
Longitudinal Predictions of Religious Change in Adolescence: Contributions from the Interaction of Attachment and Relationship Status
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2003; 20(6): 793 - 817.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
T. N. Sim and B. S. M. Loh
Attachment to God: Measurement and Dynamics
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2003; 20(3): 373 - 389.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
P. Granqvist
Attachment and Religiosity in Adolescence: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evaluations
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2002; 28(2): 260 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]