Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Yeung, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Yeung, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 1, 49-64 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167299025001005
© 1999 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Lability of Psychological Ratings: The Chameleon Effect in Global Self-Esteem

Herbert W. Marsh

University of Western Sydney, Macarthur

Alexander Seeshing Yeung

University of Western Sydney, Macarthur

The chameleon effect hypothesizes that the interpretation of esteem items and the nature of the measurement of the construct are altered by the content of other items in a survey. In each of three studies, responses to esteem items embedded among items focusing on a specific self-concept domain (academic, artistic, or physical) were more highly correlated to that specific domain than were esteem items from a broadly based multidimensional self-concept instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis models demonstrated that the same esteem items embedded in different instruments measured distinctfactors. Unlike typical contextual effects showing mean shifts along the same underlying continuum, these results suggest changes in the nature of the construct that is being measured so that mean shifts are of dubious relevance. The results have theoretical implications for how individuals form esteem judgments and practical limitations for the interpretation of esteem responses in correlational and experimental studies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. R. Sparfeldt, S. R. Schilling, D. H. Rost, and A. Thiel
Blocked Versus Randomized Format of Questionnaires: A Confirmatory Multigroup Analysis
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2006; 66(6): 961 - 974.
[Abstract] [PDF]