Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Karau, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Karau, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Group Decision Making: The Effects of Initial Preferences and Time Pressure

Janice R. Kelly

Purdue University, kelly{at}psych.purdue.edu

Steven J. Karau

Southern Illinois University, skarau{at}siu.edu

Triads, working under time pressure or not, participated in a management simulation that asked groups to decide which of two cholesterol-reducing drugs to market. The total distribution of information available to the group always favored the same drug. However, members’ initial preferences were manipulated by varying the distribution of shared information (provided to all members) and unshared information (provided to only a single member) supporting each alternative. Thus, each member’s fact sheet either (a) favored the correct decision (correct preference condition), (b) mildly favored the incorrect decision (weak incorrect preference condition), or (c) strongly favored the incorrect decision (strong incorrect preference condition). Initial preferences were major determinants of group decisions. Time pressure either enhanced or reduced decision quality depending on the strength of initial preferences and the content of the group interactions. These findings are discussed in light of Karau and Kelly’s Attentional Focus Model of group performance.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 11, 1342-1354 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167299259002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. Toma and F. Butera
Hidden Profiles and Concealed Information: Strategic Information Sharing and Use in Group Decision Making
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2009; 35(6): 793 - 806.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. K. W. De Dreu, B. A. Nijstad, and D. van Knippenberg
Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 22 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
H. Coskun
Cognitive Stimulation with Convergent and Divergent Thinking Exercises in Brainwriting: Incubation, Sequence Priming, and Group Context
Small Group Research, August 1, 2005; 36(4): 466 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. D. Henningsen and M. L. M. Henningsen
Examining Social Influence in Information-Sharing Contexts
Small Group Research, August 1, 2003; 34(4): 391 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
E. G. Sargis and J. R. Larson Jr.
Informational Centrality and Member Participation During Group Decision Making
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2002; 5(4): 333 - 347.
[Abstract] [PDF]