This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rothman, A. J. Articles by Salovey, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rothman, A. J. Articles by Salovey, P. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Systematic Influence of Gain-and Loss-Framed Messages on Interest in and Use of Different Types of Health Behavior

University of Minnesota, rothm001{at}gold.tc.umn.edu

Steven C. Martino

University of Minnesota

Brian T. Bedell

Yale University

Jerusha B. Detweiler

Yale University

Peter Salovey

Yale University

Framing health messages systematically in terms of either gains or losses influences the behaviors that people adopt. Rothman and Salovey proposed that the relative influence of gain-and loss-framed messages is contingent on people’s perception of the risk or uncertainty associated with adopting the recommended behavior. Specifically, loss-framed messages are more effective when promoting illness-detecting (screening) behaviors, but gain-framed messages are more effective when promoting health-affirming (prevention) behaviors. Two experiments provide a direct test of this conceptual framework. In Experiment 1, participants’ willingness to act after reading about a new disease was a function of how the information was framed and the type of behavior promoted. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings with a real health concern—gum disease. Gain-framed pamphlets heightened interest in a plaque-fighting mouth rinse, whereas loss-framed pamphlets heightened interest in a plaque-detecting disclosing rinse. Research on message framing provides a theoretically based guide for the development of effective health messages.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 11, 1355-1369 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167299259003


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Lijiang Shen, J. L. Monahan, N. Rhodes, and D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen The Impact of Attitude Accessibility and Decision Style on Adolescents' Biased Processing of Health-Related Public Service Announcements Communication Research, February 1, 2009; 36(1): 104 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. M. P. Klein and M. E. Stefanek Cancer Risk Elicitation and Communication: Lessons from the Psychology of Risk Perception CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2007; 57(3): 147 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Rivers, P. Salovey, D. A. Pizarro, J. Pizarro, and T. R. Schneider Message Framing and Pap Test Utilization among Women Attending a Community Health Clinic J Health Psychol, January 1, 2005; 10(1): 65 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Eiser, J. R. Eiser, and V. Greco Surviving Childhood Cancer: Quality of Life and Parental Regulatory Focus Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2004; 30(2): 123 - 133. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Salovey and P. Williams-Piehota Field Experiments in Social Psychology: Message Framing and the Promotion of Health Protective Behaviors American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 2004; 47(5): 488 - 505. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E J Strahan, K White, G T Fong, L R Fabrigar, M P Zanna, and R Cameron Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective Tob. Control, September 1, 2002; 11(3): 183 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. C. Ruiter, G. Kok, B. Verplanken, and J. Brug Evoked fear and effects of appeals on attitudes to performing breast self-examination: an information-processing perspective Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2001; 16(3): 307 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]