Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 3, 313-324 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167299025003004

Can You have too Much of a Good Thing? The Limits of Voice for Improving Satisfaction with Leaders

Randall S. Peterson

Cornell University, randall.peterson{at}cornell.edu

Research on procedural justice has consistently found that increases in voice are associated with enhanced ratings of procedural fairness, satisfaction with leaders, and acceptance of decisions made by authorities. This research extends those findings in two ways by (a) replicating the voice effect in small group decision making with a low status leader and (b) illustrating the limit of voice in improving support for leaders under conditions of persistent conflict. Results from Study 1 suggest that people care about their treatment by leaders because it provides them with information about their value within the group rather than because the leader controls important resources. Study 2 demonstrates that very high levels of voice can be associated with reduced leader support and lower levels of decision satisfaction under conditions of persistent conflict. These results suggest that extensive use of voice by leaders has limited advantages when people fundamentally disagree.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. D. Elicker, P. E. Levy, and R. J. Hall
The Role of Leader-Member Exchange in the Performance Appraisal Process
Journal of Management, August 1, 2006; 32(4): 531 - 551.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
M. Janssens and J. M. Brett
Cultural Intelligence in Global Teams: A Fusion Model of Collaboration
Group Organization Management, February 1, 2006; 31(1): 124 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
D. R. Avery and M. A. Quinones
Individual Differences and the Voice Effect: The Moderating Role of Value of Voice
Group Organization Management, February 1, 2004; 29(1): 106 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
K. S. Jaussi and S. D. Dionne
Unconventional Leader Behavior, Subordinate Satisfaction, Effort and Perception of Leader Effectiveness
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2004; 10(3): 15 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]