Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lavine, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lavine, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 3, 337-347 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167299025003006

Threat, Authoritarianism, and Voting: An Investigation of Personality and Persuasion

Howard Lavine

State University of New York at Stony Brook, hlavine{at}datalab2.sbs.sunysb.edu

Diana Burgess

University of Minnesota

Mark Snyder

University of Minnesota

John Transue

University of Minnesota

John L. Sullivan

University of Minnesota

Beth Haney

University of Minnesota

Stephen H. Wagner

Northern Illinois University

The authors examined whether the influence of persuasive messages emphasizing reward versus threat was moderated by authoritarianism. Five days before the 1996 presidential election, participants (N = 86) received either a reward-related message (emphasizing the positive benefits of voting) or a threatrelated message (emphasizing the negative consequences of failing to vote) recommending that they vote in the election. We found that high authoritarians perceived the threat message as stronger in argument quality than the reward message, and low authoritarians perceived the reward message as stronger in argument quality than the threat message. In turn, subjective perceptions of message quality exerted a direct influence on participants’ postmessage attitudes toward voting in the election. Finally, behavioral intentions mediated the influence of voting attitudes on actual voting behavior. Discussion focuses on the implications of the message frame and authoritarianism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
B. M. Hastings and B. Shaffer
Authoritarianism: The Role of Threat, Evolutionary Psychology, and the Will to Power
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2008; 18(3): 423 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Duckitt
Differential Effects of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Outgroup Attitudes and Their Mediation by Threat From and Competitiveness to Outgroups
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2006; 32(5): 684 - 696.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
D. Burgess
What Motivates Employees to Transfer Knowledge Outside Their Work Unit?
Journal of Business Communication, October 1, 2005; 42(4): 324 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
S. A. Kreindler
A Dual Group Processes Model of Individual Differences in Prejudice
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2005; 9(2): 90 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. G. McFarland
On the Eve of War: Authoritarianism, Social Dominance, and American Students' Attitudes Toward Attacking Iraq
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2005; 31(3): 360 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. E. Peterson and M. D. Lane
Implications of Authoritarianism for Young Adulthood: Longitudinal Analysis of College Experiences and Future Goals
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2001; 27(6): 678 - 690.
[Abstract] [PDF]