Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cejka, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eagly, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cejka, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eagly, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Gender-Stereotypic Images of Occupations Correspond to the Sex Segregation of Employment

Mary Ann Cejka

Center for Mission Research and Study at Maryknoll, mcejka{at}maryknoll.org

Alice H. Eagly

Northwestern University, eagly{at}nwu.edu

This study examines the role of gender stereotypes in justifying the social system by maintaining the division of labor between the sexes. The distribution of the sexes in 80 occupations was predicted from participants’ beliefs that six dimensions of gender-stereotypic attributes contribute to occupational success: masculine physical, feminine physical, masculine personality, feminine personality, masculine cognitive, and feminine cognitive. Findings showed that, to the extent that occupations were female dominated, feminine personality or physical attributes were thought more essential for success; to the extent that occupations were male dominated, masculine personality or physical attributes were thought more essential. Demonstrating the role of gender stereotypes in justifying gender hierarchy, occupations had higher prestige in that participants believed that they required masculine personality or cognitive attributes for success, and they had higher earnings to the extent that they were thought to require masculine personality attributes.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 4, 413-423 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167299025004002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
R. Gadassi and I. Gati
The Effect of Gender Stereotypes on Explicit and Implicit Career Preferences
The Counseling Psychologist, August 1, 2009; 37(6): 902 - 922.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
V. Gupta and C. Fernandez
Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in Characteristics Attributed to Entrepreneurs: A Three-Nation Study
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, February 1, 2009; 15(3): 304 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
Sei Jin Ko, C. M. Judd, and D. A. Stapel
Stereotyping Based on Voice in the Presence of Individuating Information: Vocal Femininity Affects Perceived Competence but Not Warmth
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2009; 35(2): 198 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
W. L. Gardner, B. J. Reithel, R. T. Foley, C. C. Cogliser, and F. O. Walumbwa
Attraction to Organizational Culture Profiles: Effects of Realistic Recruitment and Vertical and Horizontal Individualism--Collectivism
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2009; 22(3): 437 - 472.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
V. K. Gupta and N. M. Bhawe
The Influence of Proactive Personality and Stereotype Threat on Women's Entrepreneurial Intentions
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, May 1, 2007; 13(4): 73 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
K. S. Lyness and C. A. Schrader
Moving Ahead or Just Moving?: An Examination of Gender Differences in Senior Corporate Management Appointments
Group Organization Management, December 31, 2006; 31(6): 651 - 676.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
A. B. Diekman, A. H. Eagly, A. Mladinic, and M. C. Ferreira
Dynamic Stereotypes about Women and Men in Latin America and the United States
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2005; 36(2): 209 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
E. Camussi and C. Leccardi
Stereotypes of working women: the power of expectations
Social Science Information, March 1, 2005; 44(1): 113 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. A. Rudman and J. B. Heppen
Implicit Romantic Fantasies and Women's Interest in Personal Power: A Glass Slipper Effect?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2003; 29(11): 1357 - 1370.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. C. Johannesen-Schmidt and A. H. Eagly
Diminishing Returns: The Effects of Income on the Content of Stereotypes of Wage Earners
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2002; 28(11): 1538 - 1545.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. M. Jackson, V. M. Esses, and C. T. Burris
Contemporary Sexism and Discrimination: The Importance of Respect for Men and Women
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2001; 27(1): 48 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. B. Diekman and A. H. Eagly
Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2000; 26(10): 1171 - 1188.
[Abstract] [PDF]