Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haslam, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haslam, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 7, 809-818 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167299025007004
© 1999 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Social Identity Salience and the Emergence of Stereotype Consensus

S. Alexander Haslam

The Australian National University

Penelope J. Oakes

The Australian National University

Katherine J. Reynolds

The Australian National University

John C. Turner

The Australian National University

In recent years, there has been a renewal of interest in the processes through which groups coordinate social perceptions and judgement. This topic is particularly important for the study of stereotyping, as most of the impact of stereotypes derives from the fact that they are widely shared within social groups. The present experiment (N = 132) tests the assertion that perceivers are more likely to generate a shared in-group stereotype to the extent that they define themselves and interact in terms of a common social category membership. Results supported predictions, indicating that manipulations intended to heighten social identity salience affected the content of self-categorizations leading to enhanced stereotype consensus and favorableness. As predicted, effects apparent when individuals completed stereotype checklists were also enhanced when checklists were completed in groups. These results are consistent with predictions derived from self-categorization theory and point to the capacity for internalized group memberships to structure and regulate cognition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Rubin and C. Badea
Why Do People Perceive Ingroup Homogeneity on Ingroup Traits and Outgroup Homogeneity on Outgroup Traits?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2007; 33(1): 31 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
P. Hutchison, J. Jetten, J. Christian, and E. Haycraft
Protecting Threatened Identity: Sticking with the Group by Emphasizing Ingroup Heterogeneity.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2006; 32(12): 1620 - 1632.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
F. Sani
When Subgroups Secede: Extending and Refining the Social Psychological Model of Schism in Groups
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2005; 31(8): 1074 - 1086.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. Stangor, G. B. Sechrist, and J. T. Jost
Changing Racial Beliefs by Providing Consensus Information
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2001; 27(4): 486 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]