Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 8, 1007-1020 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672992511008

Dispositional Envy

Richard H. Smith

University of Kentucky, rhsmit00{at}pop.uky.edu

W. Gerrod Parrott

Georgetown University

Edward F. Diener

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Rick H. Hoyle

University of Kentucky

Sung Hee Kim

University of Kentucky

Although many scholars have argued that individual differences in proneness to envy can have wide-ranging implications for social interactions, the empirical testing of these claims is largely undeveloped. We created a single-factor Dispositional Envy Scale (DES) to measure individual differences in tendencies to envy, and examined some of the implications of such differences. Study 1 indicated that the DES is a reliable, stable measure, containing items suiting theoretical criteria for the makeup of dispositional envy. Study 2 supported the construct validity of the DES by showing that it is correlated with other individual difference measures in theoretically compatible ways. Studies 3 and 4 supplied diverse ways of establishing the criterion-related validity of the DES by showing that it moderated envious responses to another person’s superiority and that it predicted envy beyond other correlated individual measures of neuroticism, self-esteem, cynical hostility, and socially desirable responding.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
B. Vidaillet
Lacanian theory's contribution to the study of workplace envy
Human Relations, November 1, 2007; 60(11): 1669 - 1700.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
W. Verbeke, F. Belschak, and R. P. Bagozzi
The Adaptive Consequences of Pride in Personal Selling
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, October 1, 2004; 32(4): 386 - 402.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
D. Patient, T. B. Lawrence, and S. Maitlis
Understanding Workplace Envy Through Narrative Fiction
Organization Studies, September 1, 2003; 24(7): 1015 - 1044.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. D. Parks, A. C. Rumble, and D. C. Posey
The Effects of Envy on Reciprocation in a Social Dilemma
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2002; 28(4): 509 - 520.
[Abstract] [PDF]