This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Batson, C. D. Articles by Fridell, S. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Batson, C. D. Articles by Fridell, S. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Value Judgments: Testing the Somatic-Marker Hypothesis Using False Physiological Feedback

University of Kansas, dbatson{at}ukans.edu

Connie L. Engel

University of Kansas

Scott R. Fridell

University of Kansas

Damasio’s somatic-marker hypothesis claims that people rely on somatic markers—physiological responses to situations of gain or loss—to make value-relevant decisions, not simply on cool reason. To test this hypothesis, undergraduates were presented with false physiological feedback as they listened to audiotapes describing situations threatening two values, freedom and equality. They were then asked to make decisions that implicated these values. Decisions favored whichever value had received stronger feedback while listening to the value-threatening situations. Feedback did not, however, affect judgments about the relative importance of the values in general; these judgments were apparently based on cognitive retrieval from memory of a stored value hierarchy, which also—and independently— affected the value-related decisions. These results supported the somatic-marker hypothesis.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 8, 1021-1032 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672992511009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?