This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gutierres, S. E. Articles by Partch, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gutierres, S. E. Articles by Partch, J. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Beauty, Dominance, and the Mating Game: Contrast Effects in Self-Assessment Reflect Gender Differences in Mate Selection

Arizona State University, West

Douglas T. Kenrick

Arizona State University

Jenifer J. Partch

Arizona State University

An experimental study examined the effects of exposure to physically attractive and dominant same-sex individuals on self-assessments. Consistent with prior findings on mate selection, it was predicted that women’s self-assessments of their mate value would be adversely affected by exposure to highly physically attractive women and would be relatively unaffected by exposure to socially dominant women. Conversely, men’s self-assessments of their mate value were expected to be more affected by the social dominance than by the physical attractiveness of the men to whom they were exposed. Findings for self-assessed judgments of desirability as a marriage partner were in line with hypotheses. Results fit with earlier findings suggesting that such effects may be caused by changes in the perceived population of competitors rather than direct changes in self-perceptions of physical appearance or dominance. Overall, findings are supportive of models assuming domain-specific rather than domain-general cognitive processes.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Ackerman and D. T. Kenrick The Costs of Benefits: Help-Refusals Highlight Key Trade-Offs of Social Life Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2008; 12(2): 118 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Hill and D. M. Buss The Mere Presence of Opposite-Sex Others on Judgments of Sexual and Romantic Desirability: Opposite Effects for Men and Women Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2008; 34(5): 635 - 647. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. K. Maner, C. N. DeWall, and M. T. Gailliot Selective Attention to Signs of Success: Social Dominance and Early Stage Interpersonal Perception Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2008; 34(4): 488 - 501. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. SENIOR, K. THOMSON, J. BADGER, and M. J.R. BUTLER Interviewing Strategies in the Face of Beauty: A Psychophysiological Investigation into the Job Negotiation Process Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 1, 2007; 1118(1): 142 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Beaulieu Avoiding costly mating mistakes: Ovulatory shifts in personal mate value assessment Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2007; 24(3): 441 - 455. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. G. Millar and N. M. Ostlund The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2006; 32(11): 1459 - 1468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. V. Becker, D. T. Kenrick, S. Guerin, and J. K. Maner Concentrating on Beauty: Sexual Selection and Sociospatial Memory Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2005; 31(12): 1643 - 1652. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. M. Buston and S. T. Emlen Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society PNAS, July 22, 2003; 100(15): 8805 - 8810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Schmitt, A. Couden, and M. Baker The Effects of Sex and Temporal Context on Feelings of Romantic Desire: An Experimental Evaluation of Sexual Strategies Theory Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2001; 27(7): 833 - 847. [Abstract] [PDF]