|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 10,
1189-1199 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167200262002
© 2000 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
Stereotype Threat: Are Lower Status and History of Stigmatization Preconditions of Stereotype Threat?
Jacques-Philippe Leyens
Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, leyens{at}upso.ucl.ac.be
Michel Désert
Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve
Jean-Claude Croizet
University of Clermont-Ferrand
Catherine Darcis
Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve
This research extended stereotype-threat effects outside of the academic domain and to a nonstigmatized group. Female and male students performed three decision tasks: lexical, valence, and affective processing. Half of the participants were told that, in general, men are poorer performers than are women in affective processing tasks. No differences between conditions were observed for the lexical and valence tasks. By contrast, for the affective task, threatened men made significantly more errors than did participants in the other three conditions. More precisely, threatened men tended to accept as affective words that were not affective. This latter result suggests that threatened men decreased their threshold for affectivity "to prove" the inapplicability of the stereotype to themselves. Moreover, stereotype endorsement did not mediate the results. Identification with the affective domain, on the other hand, moderated the effect of stereotype threat. Discussion considers the consequences of these findings for everyday interactions.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Shapiro and S. L. Neuberg
From Stereotype Threat to Stereotype Threats: Implications of a Multi-Threat Framework for Causes, Moderators, Mediators, Consequences, and Interventions
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
May 1, 2007;
11(2):
107 - 130.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. E. S. Rosenthal and R. J. Crisp
Reducing Stereotype Threat by Blurring Intergroup Boundaries
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
April 1, 2006;
32(4):
501 - 511.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Frantz, A. J. C. Cuddy, M. Burnett, H. Ray, and A. Hart
A Threat in the Computer: The Race Implicit Association Test as a Stereotype Threat Experience
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2004;
30(12):
1611 - 1624.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Ford, M. A. Ferguson, J. L. Brooks, and K. M. Hagadone
Coping Sense of Humor Reduces Effects of Stereotype Threat on Women's Math Performance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
May 1, 2004;
30(5):
643 - 653.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Kray, J. Reb, A. D. Galinsky, and L. Thompson
Stereotype Reactance at the Bargaining Table: The Effect of Stereotype Activation and Power on Claiming and Creating Value
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
April 1, 2004;
30(4):
399 - 411.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. T. O'Brien and C. S. Crandall
Stereotype Threat and Arousal: Effects on Women's Math Performance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
June 1, 2003;
29(6):
782 - 789.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Tropp
The Psychological Impact of Prejudice: Implications for Intergroup Contact
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
April 1, 2003;
6(2):
131 - 149.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Keller and D. Dauenheimer
Stereotype Threat in the Classroom: Dejection Mediates the Disrupting Threat Effect on Women's Math Performance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
March 1, 2003;
29(3):
371 - 381.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Hess, C. Auman, S. J. Colcombe, and T. A. Rahhal
The Impact of Stereotype Threat on Age Differences in Memory Performance
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.,
January 1, 2003;
58(1):
P3 - 11.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Davies, S. J. Spencer, D. M. Quinn, and R. Gerhardstein
Consuming Images: How Television Commercials that Elicit Stereotype Threat Can Restrain Women Academically and Professionally
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2002;
28(12):
1615 - 1628.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|