This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sommers, S. R. Articles by Ellsworth, P. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sommers, S. R. Articles by Ellsworth, P. C. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Race in the Courtroom: Perceptions of Guilt and Dispositional Attributions

University of Michigan, ssommers{at}umich.edu

Phoebe C. Ellsworth

University of Michigan

The present studies compare the judgments of White and Black mock jurors in interracial trials. In Study 1, the defendant’s race did not influence White college students’ decisions but Black students demonstrated ingroup/outgroup bias in their guilt ratings and attributions for the defendant’s behavior. The aversive nature of modern racism suggests that Whites are motivated to appear nonprejudiced when racial issues are salient; therefore, the race salience of a trial summary was manipulated and given to noncollege students in Study 2. Once again, the defendant’s race did not influence Whites when racial issues were salient. But in the non-race-salient version of the same interracial case, White mock jurors rated the Black defendant more guilty, aggressive, and violent than the White defendant. Black mock jurors demonstrated same-race leniency in both versions of the trial, suggesting that racial issues are generally salient in the minds of Black jurors in interracial cases with Black defendants.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. W. Esqueda, R. K. E. Espinoza, and S. E. Culhane The Effects of Ethnicity, SES, and Crime Status on Juror Decision Making: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Euopean American and Mexican American Mock Jurors Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, May 1, 2008; 30(2): 181 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-W. van Prooijen Retributive Reactions to Suspected Offenders: The Importance of Social Categorizations and Guilt Probability Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2006; 32(6): 715 - 726. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Sommers and M. I. Norton Lay Theories About White Racists: What Constitutes Racism (and What Doesn't) Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2006; 9(1): 117 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Sargent and A. L. Bradfield Race and Information Processing in Criminal Trials: Does the Defendant's Race Affect How the Facts Are Evaluated? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2004; 30(8): 995 - 1008. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. A. Wyer Not all Stereotypic Biases are Created Equal: Evidence for a Stereotype-Disconfirming Bias Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2004; 30(6): 706 - 720. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. MARCUS-NEWHALL, L. P. BLAKE, and J. BAUMANN Perceptions of Hate Crime Perpetrators and Victims as Influenced by Race, Political Orientation, and Peer Group American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 2002; 46(1): 108 - 135. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Sommers and S. M. Kassin On the Many Impacts of Inadmissible Testimony: Selective Compliance, Need for Cognition, and the Overcorrection Bias Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2001; 27(10): 1368 - 1377. [Abstract] [PDF]