Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hornsey, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hornsey, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction

Matthew J. Hornsey

University of Queensland, matthewh{at}psy.uq.edu.au

Michael A. Hogg

University of Queensland

Two studies examined relations between groups (humanities and math-science students) that implicitly or explicitly share a common superordinate category (university student). In Experiment 1, 178 participants performed a noninteractive decision-making task during which category salience was manipulated in a 2 (superordinate category salience)x2 (subordinate category salience) between-groups design. Consistent with the mutual intergroup differentiation model, participants for whom both categories were salient exhibited the lowest levels of bias, whereas bias was strongest when the superordinate category alone was made salient. This pattern of results was replicated in Experiment 2 (N = 135). In addition, Experiment 2 demonstrated that members of subgroups that are nested within a superordinate category are more sensitive to how the superordinate category is represented than are members of subgroups that extend beyond the boundaries of the superordinate category.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 2, 242-256 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167200264010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
E. F. Thomas, C. McGarty, and K. I. Mavor
Transforming "Apathy Into Movement":The Role of Prosocial Emotions in Motivating Action for Social Change
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2009; 13(4): 310 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. F. Dovidio, S. L. Gaertner, and T. Saguy
Commonality and the Complexity of "We": Social Attitudes and Social Change
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2009; 13(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. Gomez, J. F. Dovidio, C. Huici, S. L. Gaertner, and I. Cuadrado
The Other Side of We: When Outgroup Members Express Common Identity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2008; 34(12): 1613 - 1626.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
E. Subasic, K. J. Reynolds, and J. C. Turner
The Political Solidarity Model of Social Change: Dynamics of Self-Categorization in Intergroup Power Relations
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2008; 12(4): 330 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
C. Zogmaister, L. Arcuri, L. Castelli, and E. R. Smith
The Impact of Loyalty and Equality on Implicit Ingroup Favoritism
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 493 - 512.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology Developing SocietiesHome page
C. Kamau and A. Rutland
A Quasi-experiment on the Effects of Superordinate Categorisation on Liking of People from Other Nations
Psychology Developing Societies, September 1, 2008; 20(2): 183 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of Early AdolescenceHome page
S. A. Norris, R. W. Roeser, L. M. Richter, N. Lewin, C. Ginsburg, S. A. Fleetwood, E. Taole, and K. van der Wolf
South African-ness Among Adolescents: The Emergence of a Collective Identity Within the Birth to Twenty Cohort Study
The Journal of Early Adolescence, February 1, 2008; 28(1): 51 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
K. W. Rockmann, M. G. Pratt, and G. B. Northcraft
Divided Loyalties: Determinants of Identification in Interorganizational Teams
Small Group Research, December 1, 2007; 38(6): 727 - 751.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. E. Amiot, R. de la Sablonniere, D. J. Terry, and J. R. Smith
Integration of Social Identities in the Self: Toward a Cognitive-Developmental Model
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2007; 11(4): 364 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
C. H. Stone and R. J. Crisp
Superordinate and Subgroup Identification as Predictors of Intergroup Evaluation in Common Ingroup Contexts
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2007; 10(4): 493 - 513.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Verkuyten and A. A. Yildiz
National (Dis)identification and Ethnic and Religious Identity: A Study Among Turkish-Dutch Muslims
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2007; 33(10): 1448 - 1462.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. Verkuyten
Religious Group Identification and Inter-Religious Relations: A Study Among Turkish-Dutch Muslims
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2007; 10(3): 341 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. J. Crisp, J. Walsh, and M. Hewstone
Crossed Categorization in Common Ingroup Contexts
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2006; 32(9): 1204 - 1218.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
F. E. Frey and L. R. Tropp
Being Seen As Individuals Versus As Group Members: Extending Research on Metaperception to Intergroup Contexts
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2006; 10(3): 265 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
Y. J. Huo and L. E. Molina
Is Pluralism a Viable Model of Diversity? The Benefits and Limits of Subgroup Respect
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2006; 9(3): 359 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
Y.-y. Hong, H.-y. Liao, G. Chan, R. Y. M. Wong, C.-y. Chiu, G. W.-m. Ip, H.-y. Fu, and I. G. Hansen
Temporal Causal Links Between Outgroup Attitudes and Social Categorization: The Case of Hong Kong 1997 Transition
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2006; 9(2): 265 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. J. Crisp, C. H. Stone, and N. R. Hall
Recategorization and Subgroup Identification: Predicting and Preventing Threats From Common Ingroups
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2006; 32(2): 230 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. J. Hornsey, L. Blackwood, and A. O'brien
Speaking for Others: The Pros and Cons of Group Advocates using Collective Language
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2005; 8(3): 245 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. J. Crisp and S. R. Beck
Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Moderating Role of Ingroup Identification
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2005; 8(2): 173 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
School Psychology InternationalHome page
A. Lewis and R. J. Crisp
Measuring Social Identity in the Professional Context of Provision for Pupils with Special Needs
School Psychology International, November 1, 2004; 25(4): 404 - 421.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
Y.-Y. Hong, J. Coleman, G. Chan, R. Y. M. Wong, C.-y. Chiu, I. G. Hansen, S.-L. Lee, Y.-Y. Tong, and H.-Y. Fu
Predicting Intergroup Bias: The Interactive Effects of Implicit Theory and Social Identity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2004; 30(8): 1035 - 1047.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
L. E. Molina, M. A. Wittig, and M. T. Giang
Mutual Acculturation and Social Categorization: A Comparison of Two Perspectives on Intergroup Bias
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2004; 7(3): 239 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. J. Hornsey and A. Imani
Criticizing Groups from the Inside and the Outside: An Identity Perspective on the Intergroup Sensitivity Effect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2004; 30(3): 365 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Wenzel, A. Mummendey, U. Weber, and S. Waldzus
The Ingroup as Pars Pro Toto: Projection From the Ingroup Onto the Inclusive Category as a Precursor to Social Discrimination
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2003; 29(4): 461 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
Y. J. Huo
Procedural Justice and Social Regulation Across Group Boundaries: Does Subgroup Identity Undermine Relationship-Based Governance?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2003; 29(3): 336 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. J. Hornsey, R. Spears, I. Cremers, and M. A. Hogg
Relations Between High and Low Power Groups: The Importance of Legitimacy
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2003; 29(2): 216 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. Riketta
Intergroup Comparisons within the Context of Nested Self-Categorizations: Effects of Regional and National Comparisons on the Acceptance of the European Union
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2002; 5(2): 119 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
Q. Li and Y.-Y. Hong
Intergroup Perceptual Accuracy Predicts Real-Life Intergroup Interactions
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2001; 4(4): 341 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. A. Hogg
A Social Identity Theory of Leadership
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2001; 5(3): 184 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. J. Hornsey and M. A. Hogg
Intergroup Similarity and Subgroup Relations: Some Implications for Assimilation
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2000; 26(8): 948 - 958.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. J. Hornsey and M. A. Hogg
Assimilation and Diversity: An Integrative Model of Subgroup Relations
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2000; 4(2): 143 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]