Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ceschi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ceschi, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 3, 327-339 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167200265006

Criteria for Emotion Recognition from Verbal and Nonverbal Expression: Studying Baggage Loss in the Airport

Klaus R. Scherer

University of Geneva

Grazia Ceschi

University of Geneva

The issue of emotion recognition in real-life settings, lacking a clear criterion of the nature of the underlying emotion, is raised. After reporting their luggage lost, 110 airline passengers were asked to rate their emotional state (subjective feeling criterion). The agents who had processed the claims were asked to rate the passengers’ emotional state (objective behavior criterion) as well as their own feelings. An excerpt of the videotaped interaction for 40 passengers was rated for emotional state by judges on the basis of (a) verbal and nonverbal cues or (b) nonverbal cues only. As predicted, the data show that judges’ inferences in both exposure conditions correlate more strongly with the objective behavior (agent ratings) than the subjective feeling criterion (self-ratings). Using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS), objectively coded "felt" (but not false) smiles correlated positively with a good humor scale in both criteria and judges’ ratings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
K. S. Dallimore, B. A. Sparks, and K. Butcher
The Influence of Angry Customer Outbursts on Service Providers' Facial Displays and Affective States
Journal of Service Research, August 1, 2007; 10(1): 78 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
K. R. Scherer
What are emotions? And how can they be measured?
Social Science Information, December 1, 2005; 44(4): 695 - 729.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
M. von Salisch
Children's emotional development: Challenges in their relationships to parents, peers, and friends
International Journal of Behavioral Development, July 1, 2001; 25(4): 310 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]