Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ji, L.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Nisbett, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ji, L.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Nisbett, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 5, 585-593 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167200267006

Culture, Autobiographical Memory, and Behavioral Frequency Reports: Measurement Issues in Cross-Cultural Studies

Li-Jun Ji

University of Michigan

Norbert Schwarz

University of Michigan, nschwarz{at}umich.edu

Richard E. Nisbett

University of Michigan

Chinese and American respondents were equally likely to rely on response scales as a frame of reference in estimating the frequencies of unobservable behaviors, for which people have little episodic knowledge. Moreover, both drew on information extracted from the scales in making comparative judgments involving the self. Chinese respondents, however, were less influenced by the response alternatives than were Americans for observable behaviors, both in their behavioral reports and comparative judgments. The authors suggest that this occurred because members of collectivist societies attend closely to their own and others’ behaviors to ensure smooth social functioning, resulting in memories for behaviors that Americans can only estimate.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
B. Shulruf, J. Hattie, and R. Dixon
Development of a New Measurement Tool for Individualism and Collectivism
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 2007; 25(4): 385 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
Y. Zhang, L. Feick, and L. J. Price
The Impact of Self-Construal on Aesthetic Preference for Angular Versus Rounded Shapes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2006; 32(6): 794 - 805.
[Abstract] [PDF]