Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farwell, L.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Farwell, L.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 7, 845-852 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167200269009

Bleeding Hearts and the Heartless: Popular Perceptions of Liberal and Conservative Ideologies

Lisa Farwell

University of California, Los Angeles, farwell_lisa{at}smc.edu

Bernard Weiner

University of California, Los Angeles

Two studies explored liberals’ and conservatives’ perceptions of themselves and other liberals and conservatives. Participants reported how much assistance they would recommend for needy persons who were nonresponsible and responsible for their plights (i.e., were more and less deserving) and predicted how much liberal and conservative others would recommend. Relative to liberal participants, conservatives reported being less generous toward responsible persons but did not differ in their self-reported generosity toward nonresponsible persons. Both groups viewed conservatives as somewhat heartless, giving less than liberals whether the needy were responsible or nonresponsible. A shared stereotype of a bleeding heart liberal also was revealed—overall, persons overestimated liberals’ generosity toward the responsible, but this was strongest among conservatives, which the authors termed the "Limbaugh Effect." Results also suggested self-enhancement; liberals and conservatives reported being generous and judicious. Results are discussed in terms of their relevance to lay conceptions of ideology and political rhetoric.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
E. Balcetis and D. A. Dunning
A Mile in Moccasins: How Situational Experience Diminishes Dispositionism in Social Inference
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2008; 34(1): 102 - 114.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
R. Shirazi and A. Biel
Internal-External Causal Attributions and Perceived Government Responsibility for Need Provision: A 14-Culture Study
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2005; 36(1): 96 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
R. A. Frey and L. A. Powell
Beyond Left-Right Ideology in the Study of Justice Perception: Interdependent and Independent Distributive Worldviews in Jamaica and New Zealand
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2005; 36(1): 117 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]