Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Locke, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nekich, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Locke, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nekich, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 7, 864-874 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167200269011

Agency and Communion in Naturalistic Social Comparison

Kenneth D. Locke

University of Idaho, klocke{at}uidaho.edu

Jamie C. Nekich

University of Idaho

The authors suggest that social comparison research has neglected communal feelings and concerns because it typically asks participants to compare objective characteristics that invite evaluative rankings (e.g., test scores) with acquaintances or strangers without any interaction. The authors asked 138 undergraduates to record their spontaneous social comparisons for 1 week; they found that participants often compared subjective characteristics (e.g., feelings), with close others, and during interactions. Comparing subjective characteristics, with close others, or during interactions increased the likelihood of communal outcomes (e.g., feeling connected, focusing on similarities as opposed to differences). Communal traits also predicted feeling connected during comparisons; agentic traits predicted feeling confident and comparing downward. The authors conclude that the basic interpersonal axes—agency and communion— together shape social comparisons as they occur in daily life.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. D. Locke
Personalized and Generalized Comparisons: Causes and Consequences of Variations in the Focus of Social Comparisons
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2007; 33(2): 213 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. D. Locke
Connecting the Horizontal Dimension of Social Comparison With Self-Worth and Self-Confidence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2005; 31(6): 795 - 803.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. Zagefka and R. Brown
Comparisons and Perceived Deprivation in Ethnic Minority Settings
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2005; 31(4): 467 - 482.
[Abstract] [PDF]