Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arnkelsson, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arnkelsson, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, W. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of Stable and Unstable Attributes on Ability Assessment in Social Comparison

Gudmundur B. Arnkelsson

University of Iceland, gudmuarn{at}hi.is

William P. Smith

Vanderbilt University, william.p.smith{at}vanderbilt.edu

Social comparison theory assumes that people rely on the multiple sufficient causes of attributional schema for ability assessment. When standing on performance-related attributes differs between two individuals, ability judgments should be low in confidence to the extent that performance differences are consistent with the attribute differences and high in confidence when the two are inconsistent. The authors argue that this holds true for standing on unstable attributes such as practice but not for stable attributes such as education. Stable attributes serve as cues to ability rather than as alternative interpretations of performance differences. In a series of three experiments, participants’ ability judgments were more confident when performance was consistent with their standing on stable attributes (education, occupation) but less confident when consistent with standing on an unstable attribute (practice).

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 8, 936-947 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672002610004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Costarelli
Intergroup Threat and Experienced Affect: The Distinct Roles of Causal Attributions, Ingroup Identification, and Perceived Legitimacy of Intergroup Status
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2007; 33(11): 1481 - 1491.
[Abstract] [PDF]