Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabini, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sabini, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 1, 104-117 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201271009
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Shame and Embarrassment Revisited

John Sabini

University of Pennsylvania, sabini{at}psych.upenn.edu

Brian Garvey

University of Pennsylvania

Amanda L. Hall

University of Pennsylvania

The authors report three studies guided by Sabini and Silver’s view of the shame-embarrassment distinction. In each study, participants reported the emotions they would feel in scenarios. In Studies 1 and 2, they found that people reported experiencing shame if a real flaw was exposed but reported embarrassment if an audience member would (reasonably) think such a flaw was exposed. In Study 3, the authors found that the unreasonable perceptions of a flaw by an audience led to reported anger. The data are consistent with the view that people refer to themselves as experiencing shame when they believe that a real flaw of their self has been revealed, they refer to themselves as experiencing embarrassment when they believe that others have reason to think a flaw has been revealed, and they refer to themselves as angry when they believe others unreasonably see them as flawed. The data are inconsistent with the view that embarrassment is tied to violations of conventions, whereas shame is tied to moral failings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
B. H. Hodges and A. L. Geyer
A Nonconformist Account of the Asch Experiments: Values, Pragmatics, and Moral Dilemmas
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2006; 10(1): 2 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child MaltreatHome page
T. J. Ferguson
Mapping Shame and Its Functions in Relationships
Child Maltreat, November 1, 2005; 10(4): 377 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
E. Cowley
Views From Consumers Next in Line: The Fundamental Attribution Error in a Service Setting
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, April 1, 2005; 33(2): 139 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
N. Harris, L. Walgrave, and J. Braithwaite
Emotional Dynamics in Restorative Conferences
Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 2004; 8(2): 191 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]