Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Feather, N. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Feather, N. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 1, 30-37 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201271003
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

An Attribution-Value Model of Prejudice: Anti-Fat Attitudes in Six Nations

Christian S. Crandall

University of Kansas, crandall{at}ukans.edu

Silvana D’Anello

University of Kansas

Nuray Sakalli

University of Kansas

Eleana Lazarus

University of Kansas

Grazyna Wieczorkowska Nejtardt

University of Warsaw

N. T. Feather

The Flinders University

The authors propose an Attribution-Value model of prejudice, which hypothesizes that people are prejudiced against groups that they feel have some negative attribute for which they are held responsible. The structure of prejudice against fat people was compared in six nations: Australia, India, Poland, Turkey, the United States of America, and Venezuela. Both a negative cultural value for fatness and a tendency to hold people responsible predicts anti-fat prejudice. Most important, a multiplicative hypothesis was supported—people with both a negative value for fatness and a tendency to hold people responsible were more anti-fat than could be predicted from cultural value and attributions alone. These effects were more pronounced in individualist cultures. The authors develop the Attribution-Value model of prejudice that can apply to prejudice of many sorts across many cultures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
C. O. Stewart
Social cognition and discourse processing goals in the analysis of `ex-gay' rhetoric
Discourse Society, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 63 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
K. H. Banks and L. P. Kohn-Wood
The Influence of Racial Identity Profiles on the Relationship Between Racial Discrimination and Depressive Symptoms
Journal of Black Psychology, August 1, 2007; 33(3): 331 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
M. B. Schwartz and K. D. Brownell
Actions Necessary to Prevent Childhood Obesity: Creating the Climate for Change
J. Law Med. Ethics, March 1, 2007; 35(1): 78 - 89.
[PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. R. Kaiser, P. S. Dyrenforth, and N. Hagiwara
Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2006; 32(11): 1423 - 1536.
[Abstract] [PDF]