This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mussweiler, T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Mussweiler, T. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Focus of Comparison as a Determinant of Assimilation Versus Contrast in Social Comparison

Universität Würzburg, mussweiler{at}psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de

Previous research on self-other similarity judgments has demonstrated that perceived similarity between self and other depends on the focus of comparison. Based on the Selective Accessibility model, which assumes that comparisons with similar others yield assimilation, whereas comparisons with dissimilar others yield contrast, the author hypothesized that the focus of a social comparison would influence its consequences. Specifically, comparing the standard to the self (focus of comparison other self) should increase perceived similarity so that self-evaluations are assimilated to the standard. Comparing the self to the standard (focus of comparison self other), however, should reduce perceived similarity so that contrast ensues. This pattern was obtained in two studies. Moreover, Study 2 demonstrates that the occurrence of assimilation versus contrast as a consequence of manipulating the focus of comparison is mediated by the perceived similarity to the standard.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Spears, E. Gordijn, A. Dijksterhuis, and D. A. Stapel Reaction in Action: Intergroup Contrast in Automatic Behavior Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2004; 30(5): 605 - 616. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Broemer and M. Diehl What You Think is What You Get: Comparative Evaluations of Close Relationships Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2003; 29(12): 1560 - 1569. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. D. Markman and M. N. McMullen A Reflection and Evaluation Model of Comparative Thinking Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2003; 7(3): 244 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. Quinn and J. M. Olson Framing Social Judgment: Self-Ingroup Comparison and Perceived Discrimination Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2003; 29(2): 228 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]