Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bizman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Krotman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bizman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Krotman, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 10, 1291-1300 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672012710005
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Group-Based Emotional Distress: An Extension of Self-Discrepancy Theory

Aharon Bizman

Bar Ilan University, Israel, bizman{at}mail.biu.ac.il

Yoel Yinon

Bar Ilan University, Israel

Sharon Krotman

Bar Ilan University, Israel

The authors examined whether discrepancies related to the group-based aspects of the self are differentially associated with distinct group-based emotional distress. Perceived actual, ideal, and ought attributes; group-based dejection and agitation-related emotions; and collective self-esteem and fear of negative evaluation of Israelis were assessed among 118 native Israelis. The actual-ideal group discrepancy was uniquely related to dejection-related emotions and to private collective self-esteem (CSE). In contrast, the actual-ought group discrepancy was uniquely linked to agitation-related emotions and to fear of negative Israeli evaluation. Furthermore, the actual-ought discrepancy association with fear of negative group evaluation was present only among low identifiers. Overall, the findings suggest the applicability of self-discrepancy theory in explaining emotional distress resulting from group membership.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Costarelli
Intergroup Threat and Experienced Affect: The Distinct Roles of Causal Attributions, Ingroup Identification, and Perceived Legitimacy of Intergroup Status
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2007; 33(11): 1481 - 1491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. V. Petrocelli and E. R. Smith
Who I Am, Who We Are, and Why: Links Between Emotions and Causal Attributions for Self- and Group Discrepancies
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2005; 31(12): 1628 - 1642.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Keller and D. Dauenheimer
Stereotype Threat in the Classroom: Dejection Mediates the Disrupting Threat Effect on Women's Math Performance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2003; 29(3): 371 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]