Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parks, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rumble, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Parks, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rumble, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 10, 1301-1309 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672012710006
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Elements of Reciprocity and Social Value Orientation

Craig D. Parks

Washington State University, parkscd{at}mail.wsu.edu

Ann C. Rumble

Washington State University

This study assessed the impact of social value orientation on the ability of a reciprocal choice strategy to induce high rates of cooperative behavior in a prisoner’s dilemma. Prosocials, competitors, and individualists played against reciprocal strategies for which delay of reciprocation of both cooperation and noncooperation were orthogonally manipulated. As predicted, individualists cooperated most frequently against Tit-for-tat, competitors when retaliation for noncooperation was delayed, and prosocials when their cooperative choice was immediately reciprocated. In addition, it was found that prosocials began "behavioral assimilation" as early as the second of four five-trial blocks and that changes in competitors’ rate of cooperation over time were determined by immediacy of reciprocating cooperation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
C. K. W. De Dreu, E. S. Kluwer, and A. Nauta
The Structure and Management of Conflict: Fighting or Defending the Status Quo
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2008; 11(3): 331 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. Van den Bergh, S. Dewitte, and D. De Cremer
Are prosocials unique in their egalitarianism? The pursuit of equality in outcomes among individualists.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2006; 32(9): 1219 - 1231.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Joireman and B. Duell
Mother Teresa Versus Ebenezer Scrooge: Mortality Salience Leads Proselfs to Endorse Self-Transcendent Values (Unless Proselfs Are Reassured)
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2005; 31(3): 307 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
T. Hopthrow and L. G. Hulbert
The Effect of Group Decision Making on Cooperation in Social Dilemmas
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2005; 8(1): 89 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
V. Liberman, S. M. Samuels, and L. Ross
The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner's Dilemma Game Moves
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2004; 30(9): 1175 - 1185.
[Abstract] [PDF]