Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bleske-Rechek, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buss, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bleske-Rechek, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buss, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 10, 1310-1323 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672012710007
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Opposite-Sex Friendship: Sex Differences and Similarities in Initiation, Selection, and Dissolution

April L. Bleske-Rechek

Vanderbilt University, april.bleske{at}vanderbilt.edu

David M. Buss

The University of Texas at Austin

The authors hypothesized that people form opposite-sex friendships (OSFs), in part, to acquire long-term mates (both sexes), to gain short-term sexual access (men more than women), and to gain physical protection (women more than men). In Study 1, men and women evaluated reasons for initiating OSFs, characteristics preferred in an OSF, and reasons for ending OSFs. Study 2 extended the framework to include individual differences in sociosexual orientation. Compared with women, men judged sexual attraction and a desire for sex as more important reasons for initiating OSFs, reported a preference for sexual attractiveness when selecting OSFs, and judged the lack of sex as a more important reason for dissolving OSFs. Women judged physical protection as a more important reason for initiating OSFs and the lack of it as a more important reason for dissolving them. Across sex, people with an unrestricted sexual style were more likely to perceive OSFs as opportunities for sex. Discussion addresses the implications of the results for understanding conflict in OSFs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
O. Gillath, M. Mikulincer, G. E. Birnbaum, and P. R. Shaver
When Sex Primes Love: Subliminal Sexual Priming Motivates Relationship Goal Pursuit
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2008; 34(8): 1057 - 1069.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
S. K. Cheung and C. McBride-Chang
Correlates of cross-sex friendship satisfaction in Hong Kong adolescents
International Journal of Behavioral Development, January 1, 2007; 31(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
G. E. Birnbaum and O. Gillath
Measuring subgoals of the sexual behavioral system: What is sex good for?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2006; 23(5): 675 - 701.
[Abstract] [PDF]