Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van den Bos, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lind, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van den Bos, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lind, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Psychology of Own Versus Others’ Treatment: Self-Oriented and Other-Oriented Effects on Perceptions of Procedural Justice

Kees van den Bos

Free University Amsterdam, k.vandenbos{at}fss.uu.nl

E. Allan Lind

Duke University

This article focuses on how people interpret their own versus others’ treatment. Two experiments investigate how perceived procedural justice is affected by procedures that are experienced personally versus those seen to have been experienced by others. The studies show that, at least under some conditions, the treatment of others is as potent a consideration in justice judgments as is one’s own treatment. These findings are contrasted with previous insights into the psychology of social justice in general and procedural justice in particular.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 10, 1324-1333 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672012710008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
G. H.-L. Cheng, K. S. Fielding, M. A. Hogg, and D. J. Terry
Reactions to Procedural Discrimination in an Intergroup Context: The Role of Group Membership of the Authority
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2009; 12(4): 463 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
A. Li and R. Cropanzano
Fairness at the Group Level: Justice Climate and Intraunit Justice Climate
Journal of Management, June 1, 2009; 35(3): 564 - 599.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
F. J. Crosby and J. L. Franco
Connections Between the Ivory Tower and the Multicolored World: Linking Abstract Theories of Social Justice to the Rough and Tumble of Affirmative Action
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2003; 7(4): 362 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. J. Skitka and E. Mullen
Understanding Judgments of Fairness in a Real-World Political Context: A Test of the Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2002; 28(10): 1419 - 1429.
[Abstract] [PDF]