Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dolinski, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rudak, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dolinski, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rudak, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 11, 1395-1406 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672012711001
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Dialogue Involvement as a Social Influence Technique

Dariusz Dolinski

University of Opole, Poland, darek{at}uni.opole.pl

Magdalena Nawrat

University of Opole, Poland

Izabela Rudak

Pentor, Poland

When a request is preceded by a casual dialogue, the approached person is more likely to comply than when the same request follows a monologue. This effect appeared to be strong and replicable in a series of field studies. Across experiments, the issues discussed in conversations between the confederates and the participants and the nature of the critical request varied, suggesting that the effect is generalized. In social situations, the two basic modes of communication (dialogue and monologue) are characteristic of different types of interactions. Dialogue is characteristic of encounters with one’s friends and acquaintances, whereas monologue is more prevalent in contacts with strangers. As a result of social learning, a dialogue makes us prone to treat a stranger as someone we know and thus become more eager to comply with her or his requests. Although the results obtained in the studies are consisted with this model, alternative explanations and limitations of the research also are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
G. Cowan and A. Arsenault
Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, March 1, 2008; 616(1): 10 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. M. Burger, N. Messian, S. Patel, A. del Prado, and C. Anderson
What a Coincidence! The Effects of Incidental Similarity on Compliance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2004; 30(1): 35 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]