Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cantor, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cantor, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 12, 1567-1577 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672012712001
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Association of Intimacy Goals and Marital Satisfaction: A Test of Four Mediational Hypotheses

Catherine A. Sanderson

Amherst College, casanderson{at}amherst.edu

Nancy Cantor

University of Michigan

This research examines the association of intimacy goals and marital satisfaction and tests four potential mediators of the goals-satisfaction link. Forty-four married couples completed measures of their own intimacy goals, their perceptions of their spouse’s goals, patterning of marital interactions (e.g., social support, time spent together, number of activities engaged in together, mutual influence), and marital satisfaction. As predicted, both individuals’ own and their spouses’ pursuit of intimacy goals were associated with marital satisfaction. However, these associations between goals and satisfaction were eliminated when individuals’ perceptions of their spouses’ goals were included in the analysis, indicating that the link between intimacy goals and marital satisfaction was mediated by individuals’ perceptions of their spouses’ goals. Discussion focuses on the theoretical and applied implications of these findings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. J. Elliot, S. L. Gable, and R. R. Mapes
Approach and Avoidance Motivation in the Social Domain
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2006; 32(3): 378 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J.-P. Laurenceau, A. B. Troy, and C. S. Carver
Two Distinct Emotional Experiences in Romantic Relationships: Effects of Perceptions Regarding Approach of Intimacy and Avoidance of Conflict
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2005; 31(8): 1123 - 1133.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
C. A. Sanderson, K. B. Rahm, and S. A. Beigbeder
The link between the pursuit of intimacy goals and satisfaction in close same-sex friendships: An examination of the underlying processes
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2005; 22(1): 75 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
Y.-C. Lin and P. Raghubir
Gender Differences in Unrealistic Optimism About Marriage and Divorce: Are Men More Optimistic and Women More Realistic?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2005; 31(2): 198 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
C. A. Sanderson and K. H. Karetsky
Intimacy Goals and Strategies of Conflict Resolution in Dating Relationships: A Mediational Analysis
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2002; 19(3): 317 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]