Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanton, H.
Right arrow Articles by Price, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blanton, H.
Right arrow Articles by Price, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 12, 1627-1636 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672012712006
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Pessimistic Bias in Comparative Evaluations: A Case of Perceived Vulnerability to the Effects of Negative Life Events

Hart Blanton

State University of New York at Albany, hblanton{at}csc.albany.edu

Danny Axsom

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Kimberly P. McClive

State University of New York at Albany

Simani Price

American Institutes for Research

This study tested the hypothesis that unrealistic pessimism characterizes comparative estimates of coping ability. Participants rated their ability to adjust to a range of negative life events in comparison to the abilities of other same-sex students at their college. Most coping estimates showed signs of unrealistic pessimism, in that students rated their own abilities as worse than those of other same-sex students. Analyses indicated that this effect was due, in part, to the presence of an egocentric bias and, in part, to the absence of a self-enhancement bias. First, pessimism appeared to arise because participants paid more attention to the difficulties that they would have coping with severe misfortunes than they paid to the difficulties that others would have. Second, pessimism appeared to arise because participants were not motivated to enhance their coping appraisals, given that they were optimistic that they would not experience these events in the future.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
W. M. P. Klein and M. E. Stefanek
Cancer Risk Elicitation and Communication: Lessons from the Psychology of Risk Perception
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2007; 57(3): 147 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. R. Chambers, P. D. Windschitl, and J. Suls
Egocentrism, Event Frequency, and Comparative Optimism: When what Happens Frequently is "More Likely to Happen to Me"
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2003; 29(11): 1343 - 1356.
[Abstract] [PDF]