Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, D. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 12, 1648-1661 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672012712008
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Lessons from the Past: Do People Learn from Experience that Emotional Reactions Are Short-Lived?

Timothy D. Wilson

University of Virginia, tdw{at}virginia.edu

Jay Meyers

University of Virginia

Daniel T. Gilbert

Harvard University

Do people learn from experience that emotional reactions to events are often short-lived? Two studies indicate that it depends on whether the events are positive or negative. People who received positive or negative feedback on a test were not as happy or unhappy as they would have predicted. People in the positive feedback condition did not learn from this experience when making predictions about their reactions to future positive events. People in the negative feedback condition moderated their predictions about their reactions to future negative events, but this may not have been a result of learning. Rather, participants denigrated the test as a way of making themselves feel better and, when predicting future reactions, brought to mind this reconstrual of the test and inferred that doing poorly on it again would not make them very unhappy. Experience with a negative event (but not with a positive event) may improve the accuracy of one’s affective forecasts, but the extent to which people learn from their affective forecasting errors may be limited.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Hynie, T. K. MacDonald, and S. Marques
Self-Conscious Emotions and Self-Regulation in the Promotion of Condom Use
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2006; 32(8): 1072 - 1084.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. C. H. Lam, R. Buehler, C. McFarland, M. Ross, and I. Cheung
Cultural Differences in Affective Forecasting: The Role of Focalism
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2005; 31(9): 1296 - 1309.
[Abstract] [PDF]