Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nezlek, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gable, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nezlek, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gable, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 12, 1692-1704 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01461672012712012
© 2001 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Depression as a Moderator of Relationships between Positive Daily Events and Day-to-Day Psychological Adjustment

John B. Nezlek

College of William & Mary, john.nezlek{at}wm.edu

Shelly L. Gable

University of California, Los Angeles, gable{at}psych.ucla.edu

For 21 days, 123 participants provided measures of their daily depressogenic adjustment, including Beck’s cognitive triad, causal uncertainty, control over the environment, self-esteem, and anxiety, and they described the positive and negative events that occurred. Daily adjustment negatively covaried with the number of negative events occurring each day and, except as measured by anxiety, positively covaried with positive events. The covariance between negative events and adjustment was stronger than the covariance between positive events and adjustment. Participants also provided measures of depressive symptoms. For the self-esteem and cognitive triad measures, adjustment covaried more strongly with negative and positive events for the depressed than they did for the nondepressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
G. D. Sideridis
Why Are Students With LD Depressed?: A Goal Orientation Model of Depression Vulnerability
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2007; 40(6): 526 - 539.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
V. Zeigler-Hill and C. J. Showers
Self-Structure and Self-Esteem Stability: The Hidden Vulnerability of Compartmentalization
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2007; 33(2): 143 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
I. R. Newby-Clark and M. Ross
Conceiving the Past and Future
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2003; 29(7): 807 - 818.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. B. Nezlek and R. M. Plesko
Affect- and Self-Based Models of Relationships between Daily Events and Daily Well-Being
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2003; 29(5): 584 - 596.
[Abstract] [PDF]